Sunday, October 19, 2014

Classical Conditioning



June 17, 2013

     Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936), noted father of classical conditioning, once stated “It is not accidental that all phenomena of human life are dominated by the search for daily bread - the oldest link connecting all living things, man included, with the surrounding nature” (Pavlov, 1904, para 1).  The importance of any form of behavioral psychology is to understand the theory in which it is presented; Pavlov presented classical conditioning in 1927 when he delved into the association between “learned and unlearned components in dog’s behavior” (Cooper, 2009, para 3).  Thus the best way to view the theories of classical conditioning may be to look at how dogs are conditioned to autonomic responses, and the association between that unconditioned response (UR) to unconditioned stimuli (UCS) and a conditioned stimulus (CS), which produce a controlled response (CR).
Theory
     As mentioned, Pavlov suggested that classical conditioning is the association between a stimuli and a response.  The primary response is that of an unconditioned response to some unconditioned stimuli (e.g., salivation upon the presentation of food).  These are considered instinctual behaviors.  With classical conditioning, a secondary stimuli (CS) is paired with the US and the UR to create a conditioned or controlled response (CR), thus training or learning takes place.  Pavlov used this association to train his dogs to salivate to the sound of a bell, when naturally they only salivated at the sight of food.  Thereby, their association of the sound of a bell and the presentation of food produced the same behavior; salivation.  This theory can be used to condition other behaviors as well.
Application
      Although humans can respond differently from dogs, there are many applications of classical conditioning that remain the same, regardless.  With classical conditioning people can train affectively a pet; for example, a kennel trained dog that is a content dog, but most people find the training process challenging.  However, when classical conditioning is used it can be a snap; reconditioning the association of a negative isolated space (CS) with more positive experiences (US).  Introducing a dog to a clean, spacious kennel is important to establish a neutral response to the object, although a dog’s natural curiosity will take over; it will be cautious and jumpy as it takes in the strange object.  Praising a dog’s natural curiosity by gently and positively talking to him or her will relax the dog, and encouragement will help the dog to enter into the kennel.  Once inside, additional praise or a treat (UCS) will reinforce a positive association between the CS and the UCS, which establishes a CR to the CS.  Eventually, the dog will become so comfortable with these associations that he or she will enter into the kennel without receiving a treat or needing to be praised, its behavior takes on a higher-order conditioning.  In this situation, the animal may kennel itself as an association of a second CS (CS2); paring the CS (kennel) with CS2 (e.g., loneliness, fright, or exhaustion) elicit the CR.  However, forcing the conditions or handling the process incorrectly will cause the animal to experience negative associations, which may create whining or barking (CR); this behavior may create a conditioned response (although negative) if an association is developed between the new behavior (CR) and either a release from the CS (kennel) or the UCS is introduced (interaction with its human). 
Conditioning Chart

Condition
Description
Example 1
Example 2
UCS
Unconditioned Stimulus

natural or instinctive
Treat
Praise
CS
Conditioned Stimulus

introduced object or sound
Kennel
Kennel
UR
Unconditioned Response

result of US
Excitement
Comfort
CR
Conditioned Response

result of CS
Excitement
Comfort

     As can been seen, of the four components of classical conditioning (unconditioned stimulus, conditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, and conditioned response) only two need be present for learning to transpire (e.g., UCS-CS).  Thus an association is made between one (CS) and the other (UCS) producing the desired (or undesired) behavior (CR).  Classical conditioning transpires in everyday situations (e.g., the association of receiving a reward for taking out the trash), as mentioned training a dog to kennel is but one application of classical conditioning.  Pavlov used positive association to condition dogs to salivate to a tone; whereas, Watson used a negative association to demonstrate the effects of classical conditioning in his Little Albert experiments.  Regardless of the purpose for which classical conditioning is employed, it is an effective method in which both people and animals learn.


 

No comments:

Post a Comment