Sunday, October 19, 2014

Historical Perspectives of Abnormal Psychology





     Throughout history there is evidence of abnormal behavior, consider Daniel 4:33 from one of the oldest books in history, the Bible, when King Nebuchadnezzar went from his people and lived as one of the oxen in the fields, allowing his hair and nails to grow ragged and ate of the grass as the animals.  Though his story is but one of many who reiterate the abnormalities of human behavior, the history of psychopathology is in itself fascinating and controversial regardless of its relatively young existence.  The challenges of defining, classifying, and explaining abnormal behavior became the focus behind the core concepts that attempt to enable a more definitive definition so that treat will be more effective.  Although to fully understand the intricacies of abnormal psychology one must peer into its origins, evolutions, and theoretical models, in other word the historic perspectives of abnormal psychology. 
Origins of Abnormal Psychology
     Although psychopathology is just a few centuries-old the challenges of identifying the difference between the expected (normal) behavior and the accepted (abnormal) behavior remains vague; however, there have been considerable changes to the way people identify abnormality.  Guidelines known as core concepts (e.g., context, continuum, cultural, and historical relativism) help to identify “who is abnormal, what kind of abnormality is involved, what causes it, and how… [to treat it]” (Hansell & Damour, 2008, p. 4).  Regardless, concerning the classification of normal and abnormal behavior there are still many challenges. 
Challenges of Defining and Classifying
     Context and continuum.  According to Hansell and Damour (2008), “understanding the circumstances surrounding any behavior,” the context in which it occurs, and the demographic content (e.g., age, sex, economic classification, culture, etc.) of any behavior influence the definition, classification, explanation, and treatment of any behavioral disorder.  In addition one must take into consideration the continuum between normal and abnormal behavior for an exaggeration of normality in one person is not necessarily abnormal in another person, thus making it difficult to identify a definitive line between normal and abnormal.
     Cultural and historical relativism.  A primitive explanation of abnormal behavior or rather “mental disturbance” was that of a spiritual possession known as animism.  According to Hansell and Damour (2008), archeological evidence provides proof that the practices of drilling holes in the human skull (known as trephination) was a treatment method for patients with animism; the goal was to release the evil spirit within that was causing the disturbance.  Because historically the origins of mental illness were widely unknown it was not uncommon for the seriously ill to be sent to an asylum where conditions were often cruel and inhumane (Hansell & Damour, 2008).  Known as cultural and historical relativism, these types of behaviors were completely acceptable in their day.
Abnormal Psychology’s Evolution as a Scientific Discipline
     Categorizing psychopathology as a scientific discipline requires the use of diagnostic classifications and history reflects the first humane psychiatric treatment system was the product of the late eighteenth century “French psychiatrist Philippe Pinel (1745-1826);” however, any such system must also display both reliability and validity, which can prove challenging as well  (Hansell & Damour, 2008, p. 75).  Pinel’s initial diagnostic system, unlike the modern DSM-IV-TR, had only four types of mental abnormalities: melancholia, mania, idiocy, and dementia; although a century later, Kraepelin’s (1856-1926) diagnostic system expanded the number of diagnosable disorders to 13 (Berrior & Hauser, 1988; Jablensky, 1995; Krapelin, 1899, 1904; as restated by Hansell & Damour, 2008).  Over the last century interest in mental illness has been on the increase as has the development of its medical diagnostic system, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) published the first edition of the Diagnostic Systems Manuel (DSM-I) in 1952 with an overwhelming “108” mental disorders (Hansel & Damour, 2008, p. 76).  Since that time there have been three additional publications, the last edition (DSM-IV-TR) with “over 300 separate disorders” (p. 76).  As of May 2013 the APA was to release the publication of the DSM-5 (APA, 2013).  Despite the acceptance of the APA’s DSM, many critics content that it pathologies many normal behaviors, thus decreasing its reliability and validity; furthermore, there is additional contention of heavy biological and cultural biases (Hansell & Damour, 2008).
Theoretical Models of Abnormal Psychology
     Explaining abnormality depends on the theoretical perspective that one takes on (e.g., psychosocial, biological, sociocultural, etc.); however, the core concepts as discussed earlier should always be a part of each theory in defining, identifying, and ultimately treating any mental disorder.
     Psychosocial Perspective.  As an ever-evolving school of thought psychodynamic theorists attempt to bring the unconscious to the conscious where dangerous emotional conflicts influence maladaptive behaviors.  Therapy is achieved through insight and self-exploration, what therapists call “free association” (Hansell & Damour, 2008, p. 48).
     Biological Perspective.  Genetics and evolution obviously play a part in the development of human behavior but biological perspectives seek to identify the association between pedigree and mental disorders.  The relationship between the physical and the biochemical, specifically as it relates to the behavioral patterns.  This perspective looks heavily toward genetic predispositions and existing medical conditions as contributing factors of even the slightest mental disorder.
     Sociocultural Perspective.  Focusing on the effects of social, cultural, and familial environments sociocultural perspectives look at the uniqueness of how these forces shape normal and abnormal behaviors (Hansell & Damour, 2008).  Cultural and historical relativism is a core concept in every perspective but is the major concept in the sociocultural perspective.  A major focus on social and cultural context is important; however, maladaptive family dynamics is a key emphasis to psychopathology (Hansell & Damour, 2008).
Conclusion
     The abnormalities of man are as ageless as time but psychopathology over the last century has defined the core concepts that help to identify the who, what, and why of abnormalities.  Psychologists also face difficulties in defining and classifying abnormal behavior but strive to ensure the reliability and validity of his or her theoretical perspective.  Regardless, as rich as psychopathology’s past, its future looks even more colorful.


 

No comments:

Post a Comment